There has been a call from a "leading health expert" to lower the age of consent here in the UK.
Thankfully it has been rejected by "Downing Street".
I say thankfully, as currently teenagers here in the UK are required to stay in full-time education until they are 17, an there are plans to put the limit up to18 before teenagers leave full time education. If the age of consent had been lowered there would have been a situation where girls could have sex and possibly get pregnant, and still have to be at school. (Yes, I know that happens now, but usually the pupil is "educated elsewhere" once she starts to show.) IF...and thankfully it is not happening, but if it had, where would schools stand? Would there have had to been a change made? After all if sex at 15 had been made legal, then surely schools would have to allow for the possibility of pregnant students? And as I work in a school, I can't see that as a good thing. Not because of seeing pregnant teenage girls around, but because sometimes schools can be extremely busy, and walking down a corridor at the change of a lesson can be difficult, as they can get very crowded.
So, for once, I think the current government has made the correct decision in rejecting this proposal.
And have you noticed, when proposals like this are rejected, they never name the "expert". I, for one, would love to know why they truly thought lowering the age of consent would benefit any teenage girls? I believe the argument was to stop sexual abuse, how, it would stop it is not explained. However, I would think that sexual abuse can still be carried out whether the girl/woman is over the age of consent or not, as any unwanted attention constitutes sexual abuse as far as I can see. (That's my opinion though.)